Use cases
Agreement is a signal. Disagreement is where you look closer.
Paste the trace once. Take the fix that compiles.
Here's the error and the function that throws it. Smallest fix? Then what you'd check if it fails.
Four takes on one question. Consensus, or a list of things to verify.
What changed here in the last two years? Cite sources, and say where you're unsure.
Keep the best sentence from each.
Half as long, twice as direct. Keep my voice; no adjectives I didn't use.
Three explanations that agree are probably sound. One that differs sends you to the textbook.
Explain this in plain language with one worked example. Then what people get wrong.
Literal translation is solved. Register isn't.
Into Gujarati, for a formal client email. Which phrases did you change to stay polite?
Four models in parallel spread wider than one model four times.
Ten names. One line on what each implies, one risk. No two-noun compounds.
Long and unfriendly. Let them argue about what the clause means.
What does this oblige me to do? Flag anything one-sided and quote the wording.
Keep the metaphor that clicks. The rest cost nothing.
Explain like I'm 12 — one analogy, no jargon. Then where the analogy breaks.
Benchmarks are averages. Your work isn't.
[Your hardest recurring task, verbatim, with no hint which model you prefer.]
You'd never open four tabs. You'll happily read four answers.
Three days in this city in November, walkable, one thing per day. Assume rain.
Line-ups
| When you're… | Try | Because |
|---|---|---|
| Looking something up | Search-grounded + one chat model | One fetches, one explains |
| Writing code | Three general models, grid | The differences are the point |
| Writing prose | Everything you have | More candidates, better pick |
| Reading something long | Two big-context models | Beats five truncated answers |
| On a slow connection | Two tools, new tabs | Fewer pages, no framing |
Free · Open source · One minute to install
Puchne